(Dtc356 Blog 6) Jenkins Vs. Weinberger

After reading a passage of Jenkins book Introduction: "Worship at the Alter of Convergence" and Weinberger's book Everything is Miscellaneous, I noticed a few main points that Jenkins brought up which connects to Weinberger. 

Henry Jenkins

Jenkins Main points:

1) Convergence Culture: This concept that Jenkins brings up suggests that people are getting information is being done so on different platforms. For example, people are no longer just getting news from the newspaper, instead they might be getting all of their news from less formal sources.

2) Participatory Culture: This concept suggests that there is a shift in the production of media. Now the general public is producing media and it is no longer just for its previous formal producers.

3) Collective Intelligence: No one knows everything, but everyone knows a little. If we combine everyones knowledge we can get closer to the desired solution.  

All of these points line up with the main points of Weinberger. Convergence culture speaks on the part about how organizing data and metadata is more plausible with the innovation of the web. Participatory Culture in a sense is Web 2.0, people can now help organize as a group not an individual (i.e. flickr.com and delicious.com) or help add their own personal knowledge (i.e. wikipedia.org). Participatory culture leads to the concept of collective intelligence, this is also a Web 2.0 concept that Weinberger writes on. All three main points are reliant on one another and without the others each would not exist.

Found this funny pic on the web

(Dtc356 Blog 5) Implicit meaning

Weinberger, relying on German philosopher Heidegger, says that "the meaning of a particular thing is enabled by the web of implicit meanings we call the world" (170).


What this means to me is that the things in the world are labeled and named after what their uses are. Weinberger uses the example of a hammer, it can be described by its uses, the way it feels when you touch it, and the sounds it makes. Essentially we describe these things by the way we interact with them in our lives.


This relates to the third code in the sense that everything can be described by it's uses differently by its implicit meaning to each individual use. Take a photo for example, several people can be described differently by different people. This describes the way people tag objects for organization in the third order perfectly.


Monster- Kanye West, This is what I picture in my head. The image is organized in a hierarchy of color that this particular song gives me as well as a base reference image.

(DTC356 Blog 4) Web 2.0 organization

In chapter 5 Weinberger looks at the organization of information in retrospect to it's usability for everyone. He uses an example of Getty's Thesaurus was extremely easy to use for those who are familiar with it but to those who aren't, it is almost impossible to find anything.  The categories in which everything is organizes are too simple for the complex topics in which it is explaining and therefore makes it hard to use.  The Thesaurus example represents orders 1 and 2 (as explain earlier in a previous blog) there has to be a deciding winner, folder, or category that the information falls into.
Web 2.0 really solves this issue of over generalization of categories. Sites like delicious.com and flickr.com have proven that having a community tag images on their own organizational schemes creates a universal order that organizes metadata in a perfect fashion. This is explained as Weinberger's 3rd order.
Wienberger also gives 4 strategic ways of organization:
1)Tagging- This gives a personal user friendly way to remember how and what some thing is ex.delicious.com where people can tag previous website to remember and for others to discover.
2)Filters-With a large number of people to edit information filtering the information can keep the bad stuff out while maintaining the necessary stuff, it becomes a essential tool for web 2.0 organization. Ex. Wikipedia.com where users can edit one another articles.
3)Everything can be labeled- In completely miscellaneous the only real way to organize is to tag to help find it later.
4)Giving up control- Not one person can organize completely miscellaneous information. Web 2.0 gives use the opportunity to  compile and look through data us a reasonable means.

(DTC356 Blog 3) My organized vs your organized

The thing I keep most organized in my life is mostly shaped by my college lifestyle. My clothes unfortunately have not seen the inside of a dresser drawer in years, sad, I know... Because I have been moving in and out of new houses and apartments over my college career, I have found it so much easier to just use the large tub like containers I move them in to contain them over the school year. When the year is over and I move into a new place I simply put the lids back on and throw them in my car. I have specific types of clothes in each tub and this organization is very important to my daily routine. If for some hypothetical reason my clothes were to get mixed up in different tubs I would have a hell of a time finding it when I need it. This could pose potential problems, like for example when I am throwing on clothes 10 minutes before my class starts.  Any other person may, and would most likely organize the layout of my clothes differently. The layout of my clothes has no apparent rhyme or reason but has stuck with me over the last couple years. I find it slightly ironic because the lack of justification for order and acceptance of it reminds me of the alphabet and its organization.

(DTC356 Blog 2) Organization through Organized ideas

The first chapter of Everything is Miscellaneous, by David Weinberger discusses the idea of how much we use organization in our daily lives. Weinberger makes reference to alphabetically organizing subjects as completely outdated. He instead thinks the best form of organization has been innovated by Flickr. Users can tag images in a community, when searching for a image the search engine looks through all the tags and picks out those with specific tags. Flickr even takes this to another level not only can the uploader of the image tag categories but it lets other people tag the images as well. Tagging categories in order to organize has proven to be the most effective way to organize subject in order to sort through and find exactly what the user needs.

Periodic Table of Elements are grouped by the type of elements

Weinberger breaks organization into 3 orders:
Order 1: We use this type to organize things as they are; we put "silverware in drawers, books on the shelf, and photographs in a album" (19 Weinberger)
Order 2: We organize things with a single tag or group them in a lone category. Weinberger uses a example of photos; a any photo pertaining to the civil war will be under the category "civil war", this includes images such as muskets, cannons, or uniforms that could be in the civil war era. A great example of this is the periodic table of elements
Order 3: This is described as the "digital order" as it was really utilized and innovated  on the internet. This concept uses multiple tags on images to help users searching for a specific image will find it easier.

In Chapter 2, Weinberger looks at humans nature to organize things. The alphabet which in any sense of organization will most likely show up, in a sense it is one of the base methods of organization. But, the alphabet itself is completely random in the ordering of the letters. Humans have an innate desire to organize in some fashion. This really got my thinking about why the alphabet is order the way it is, why it has been so adopted by humans even though it has no real organization, and what are other things that have random organization?

(DTC356 Blog 1) Web 3.0 squared times ten billion

I just got the opportunity to read Tim O'Reilly and John Battelle's article Web Squared, Web 2.0 Five Years On. Before I really get into describing the main points of the article, I will give a little background on the previous article that it's proceeding. O'Reilly's article was describing the concept of  Web 2.0 and its effects on the internet. Five years later, he wrote this article once again describing the changes that the web has made.

The main points that I really took away from the article is that firstly the internet is quickly moving from our desktops and laptops  and into our pockets. More and more people are utilizing the web through mobile devices. This mobile idea itself increases the possibilities of the web in that the internet applications can be accessed anywhere there is service available. Another important fact that I was able to take away from the article is that the web is becoming increasingly intelligent at a fast rate. We are now interacting with the internet verbally; we are asking it questions and it is able to recognize what we are saying and is capable of giving us an answer, instructions, or the product that we want. The innovation of the Myford touch shows how computers are now listening and even coaching on how to drive more efficiently.  It is literally watching the way we drive, analyzing it, and giving us a new way to improve it. We are beginning to get the feeling that the internet is almost becoming a human being...



The coolest application that has come out is the idea of augmented reality. This concept is that the web can look at the outside world and recognize it. This opens the door for such amazing innovative ideas. Here is the example of Wikitude AR Travel Guide which recognizes traveler landmarks and gives a description of the subject and also other hotspots around the area.

Rin Nadeshico. Superflat artist

Typical anime and pop culture influence

Nice Vectoring

I can see the influence of "the great wave" by Hokusai